We see in our primary source material the correspondence of
two clergy members printed in a Boston newspaper, the Christian Reflector
(Fuller/ Wayland 4). Faust makes the
argument that in order for Confederate nationalism to take hold in the South,
"it had to be publicly available" (Faust 16). Faust continues by stating that "the
prewar South had relied largely on northern publishing houses and printing
technology, and wartime conditions intensified the difficulties of
communication within the region" (Faust 16). Where Boston could publish newspapers, such
as the Christian Reflector, according to Faust this was increasingly difficult in the South and the South relied
heavily on the North for their publications. (Faust 16-18)
In our survey over the last couple of weeks of Revolutionary
War America, we saw numerous sermons (many in printed form), stump pieces
(Thomas Paine), and far fewer press pieces from that era as primary
sources. In our readings for the Civil
War era South, our secondary sources utilize sermons (and a lot of hymns/
songs) (Faust 18-21), writings from individuals like John C. Calhoun (Goen
22-23), and a lot of sources -- especially in Faust's book -- from the
press.
Given the fact, as Faust argues, that the South was
essentially isolated from sources of print communication, did this place more
stress on the pulpit for communication than was the case during the Revolutionary War? However, according to Noll, there was a
twofold crisis in America on the eve of the Civil War. One, "a wide range of Protestants were
discovering that the Bible they had relied on for building up America's
republican civilization was not nearly as univocal, not nearly as easy to
interpret, not nearly as inherently unifying for an overwhelmingly Christian
people, as they once had thought." And two, "far fewer turned
seriously to Scripture to find an authoritative message concerning race or the
transformation of the American economy..." (Noll 33). He further states,
"the country had a problem because its most trusted religious authority,
the Bible, was sounding an uncertain note" (Noll 55). Can one make the
argument that fewer people relied on the clergy for their information in the
mid-nineteenth century than during the mid-eighteenth century? Did the South on the eve of the Civil War
have a "Thomas Paine"?
No comments:
Post a Comment