I found chapter 4 to be particularly interesting. In it Kidd ties evangelicalism to the beginnings
of revolution. One aspect of Kidd’s
argument can be extrapolated throughout American history: the “free-market” of religious economy. In response to being called a heretic by an
established church, the plaintiff has no recourse but to respond in kind and appeal
to a higher judge: God. Once all are heretics
no one has authority. A state sponsored
established church had traditionally used the states sword as means to silence
dissent and present it as divine intercession.
The state was an agent of God’s authority. Evangelicalism added an additional source of
authority, the people. By leaving
established churches and spreading new and unique ideas of Christianity the itinerant
preacher’s converts where proof of their righteousness. These new Christians’ growth validated their existence. By protecting the individual’s right to
choose from this “marketplace”, colonial leaders, like Jefferson, were ensuring
that colonial values would become attached to the new Christianity and ensure
an American civil religion. Naturally,
the churches which most closely reflected regional and social norms would
thrive. Jefferson’s motivation to create
this “free-market” is wonderfully reflected in the quote on page 188, “ ‘Almighty
God hath created the mind free.’
Jefferson based religious voluntarism on the example of Jesus, who
possessed the power to coerce people to follow him yet choose not to do so.” Persuasion should be unfettered in the religious
landscape as Jesus himself exemplified.
The tongue in check statement by Jefferson, who disavowed Christ’s
divinity and the existence of miracles, is hilarious and speaks precisely to
the “odd coupling” of Evangelicals and Enlightenment leaders. Here again a heretic makes a biblical
argument for heresy. As seen through the
present day. the Church which reflects the principals of the day will thrive; whether
that means preaching a message of prosperity today or millennialism at the end
of the 18th century.
No comments:
Post a Comment