It seems that through manipulation of the sermon Paine, and
perhaps others, were able to incite the colonists to turn patriotic. Dr. Byrd
emphasizes in his book the importance of the sermon during war, and especially
during the Revolutionary War, - he says that “preachers took up arms… turning
their pulpits into weapons.” Washington saw the important of the sermon, which
is obvious through his emphasis on maintaining talented army chaplains. Dr.
Byrd says that the reason for A Common Sense’s success was because it was more
like a sermon than a pamphlet. However, A Common Sense was not a sermon, it was
a pamphlet that was written like a sermon. It was read out loud to people all
over the colonies, so it was treated more like a sermon. In our society it is
very rare for people to read aloud. We are expected to read on our own. We
might hear sermons in church and if they are good we will tell our friends to
podcast them, but we wouldn’t read it to them. This is an experience of which
we are mostly unfamiliar and perhaps it is because we are a (mostly) literate
society. And so I pose the question: If Paine had been a part of a fully literate
society would A Common Sense have had as much of an impact as it did in that
society? Or was it the settings that the pamphlet was read, the communal settings,
which made it so impactful?
No comments:
Post a Comment